State officials continue to try to apply state regulations to the gaming machines operated by the Poarch Creek Indian Tribe. The NIGC has determined that the tribe's machines are Class II. And as anyone familiar with Indian gaming law knows, Class II gaming falls under tribal and federal jurisdiction. Unlike Class III gaming, there is no regulatory role for the state with Class II gaming. State law only comes into play in determining whether Class II gaming is legal in the state as operated "for any purpose by any person." And bingo is legal in Alabama.
Alabama
Alabama . . . Again
State officials continue to try to apply state regulations to the gaming machines operated by the Poarch Creek Indian Tribe. The NIGC has determined that the tribe's machines are Class II. And as anyone familiar with Indian gaming law knows, Class II gaming falls under tribal and federal jurisdiction. Unlike Class III gaming, there is no regulatory role for the state with Class II gaming. State law only comes into play in determining whether Class II gaming is legal in the state as operated "for any purpose by any person." And bingo is legal in Alabama.
Kathryn Quoted on Gov. Riley's Efforts to Close Tribal Casinos
Maybe we should extend our offer for a crash course on tribal sovereignty and Indian gaming law to the Republican gubernatorial candidate, Robert Bently . . . .
Update from Alabama
As we've written about before, Riley has been crusading against electronic bingo machines, which are illegal under state law. He's shut down commercial electronic bingo across the state. And he continues to try to shut down the Poarch Band of Creek Indians' Class II gaming operation, which features some 3000 electronic bingo machines. He claims that because the machines are illegal under state law, the tribe can't operate them.
